A26864:749
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 85.
Mr. Bl. 3. Then it will follow that as none can say that they have so answered the Command of the Law that they have never failed, they have not (if put to answer in the greatest rigour) once transgressed; so neither can they with the Church make appeal to God, That they have not dealt falsely in the Covenant, nor wickedly departed from their God. Psal. 44.17. Every sin (according to this opinion) being a breach of it, and a dealing falsely in it.
Mr. Bl. 3. THen it will follow that as none can say that they have so answered the Command of the Law that they have never failed, they have not (if put to answer in the greatest rigor) once transgressed; so neither can they with the Church make appeal to God, That they have not dealt falsly in the Covenant, nor wickedly departed from their God. Psal. 44.17. Every sin (according to this opinion) being a breach of it, and a dealing falsly in it.
§. 85.
R. B. This charge is as unjust as the former; and the absurdity supposed to follow, doth not; but is supposed so to do, upon the forementioned confusion of two acts of the Covenant, or New Law; the one Determining what shall be mans Duty; the other, what shall be Conditio sine qua non of Justification and Salvation.