A26864:761
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 88.
Mr. Bl. 6. Then the distinction between those that entered Covenant and brake it, as Jer. 31, 32, 33. and those that have the Law written in their hearts, and put into their inward parts to observe it, falls, all standing equally Guilty of the breach of it, no help of Grace being of power to enable to keep Covenant.
Mr. Bl. 6. THen the distinction between those that entred Covenant and brake it, as Jer. 31, 32, 33. and those that have the Law written in their hearts, and put into their inward parts to observe it, falls, all standing equally Guilty of the breach of it, no help of Grace being of power to enable to keep Covenant.
§. 88.
R. B. When sincere obedience and perfect obedience are all one, and when the Precept and the Condition of the Covenant are proved to be of equal extent, then there will be ground for the charging of this Consequence. In the first Covenant of Nature the Precept and the Condition were of equal extent; for perfect obedience was the Condition; but it is not so in the Covenant of Grace.