A26880:594
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And if foreign Bishops will become so pragmatical, as to make themselves Judges of other Kingdoms, which party of Competitors are the truly called Pastors, when they cannot try them, or will take the words of one party against the other, because they are uppermost, it is just to disregard their Judgment, tho they do it on pretence of Communion.
And if forreign Bishops will become so pragmatical, as to make themselves Judges of other Kingdoms, which party of Competitors are the truly called Pastors, when they cannot try them, or will take the words of one party against the other, because they are uppermost, it is just to disregard their Judgment, tho they do it on pretence of Communion.
XII. If men will turn a voluntary consultation for concord, into the Nature of a Law, tho they call it but Communion, the Church should not own their Usurpation: As the Princes of Europe are bound to do the best they can to promote by their concord the interest of Christ, and may well hold Diets or Meetings for that end; yet no man calls that Diet a Kingdom, nor hath the Major Vote a power to bind the Minor to consent, when the reason of the thing doth not bind them. So is it in the concord of foreign Churches: All are bound to agree in what Christ commandeth: But in circumstantial determinations, no man is bound further than the End and Reason of the thing requireth: Communion here is not Subjection.
XII. If men will turn a voluntary consultation for concord, into the Nature of a Law, tho they call it but Communion, the Church should not own their Usurpation: As the Princes of Europe are bound to do the best they can to promote by their concord the interest of Christ, and may well hold Diets or Meetings for that end; yet no man calls that Diet a Kingdom, nor hath the Major Vote a power to bind the Minor to consent, when the reason of the thing doth not bind them. So is it in the concord of forreign Churches: All are bound to agree in what Christ commandeth: But in circumstantial determinations, no man is bound further than the End and Reason of the thing requireth: Communion here is not Subjection.