A26880:607
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 28. He saith, [This is a pretty easy way of determining Controversies, to out-face all the authority of Scripture and Antiquity by a dogmatical assertion, without offering the least Reason, or shadow of Reason to confirm it.
§ 28. He saith, [This is a pretty easie way of determining Controversies, to out-face all the authority of Scripture and Antiquity by a dogmatical assertion, without offering the least Reason, or shadow of Reason to confirm it.
Ans. Reader, find one word of Scripture or true Antiquity that I contradict, or that ever he showed that I contradict; and judg who giveth Reason, and take not his word or mine.
Ans. Reader, find one word of Scripture or true Antiquity that I contradict, or that ever he shewed that I contradict; and judg who giveth Reason, and take not his word or mine.
§ 29. Saith he, [I had at large proved the necessity of one Catholic Communion to make one Catholic Church, and instead of answering the proof, he asserts the contrary upon his own naked authority, and that must pass for confutation.
§ 29. Saith he, [I had at large proved the necessity of one Catholick Communion to make one Catholick Church, and instead of answering the proef, he asserts the contrary upon his own naked authority, and that must pass for confutation.