A26882:101
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state…
Catholic communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty liturgy.Catholick communion doubly defended by Dr. Owens, vindicator, and Richard Baxter and the state of that communion opened, and the questions discussed, whether there be any displeasure at sin, or repentance for it in Heaven : with a parallel of the case of using a faulty translation of Scripture, and a faulty lyturgy.
London: printed for Thomas Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Hebrew phrase which we translate by Displeasing God or Man, is oft [It was Evil in his Eyes] which speaketh a positive Act of the Understanding de malo: And that there was no answerable Act of the Will, let him say that dare.
Prov. 24. 17, 18. Rejoice not when thy Enemy falleth, and let not th• heart be glad when he stumbleth, lest the Lord see it, and it displease him—] No, say you, fear not that any in Heaven should be displeased.
Prov. 24. 17, 18. Rejoyce not when thy Enemy falleth, and let not th• heart be glad when he stumbleth, lest the Lord see it, and it displease him—] No, say you, fear not that any in Heaven should be displeased.
Gen. 38. 10. The thing that he did displeased the Lord, wherefore he slew him.