A26883:421
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Istis ad amussim congruentia sunt Aquinatis illa [Quamvis Voluntas Dei sit immutabilis & invincibilis, non tamen sequitur quod etiam effectus sit necessarius necessitate absoluta—sed solum conditionata, sicut & de praescientia dictum est.] But the word [effectus] here is more than the rest say.
And more fully ibid. sect. 18. pag. (Vol. min.) 230. [Quid quod Scholastici, nominatim vero Aquinas & Durandus (nec quenquam novi aliter sentientem, N. B.) non aliam agnoscunt necessitatem rerum, ratione Voluntatis Dei, quam quae dici potest necessitas consequentiae.]
And yet plainer ibid. sect. 18. pag. 332. c. 2. [At ea necessitas quam juxta nostram sententiam oriri putat Arminius ex Decreto Dei, revera non tam ex Decreto Dei fluit, (quod monuit Perkinsius, & vere,) quam ex suppositione decreti divini, in Argumentation scilicet: quoties scilicet posito decreto Dei de re aliqua futura, legitime infertur necesse esse ut suo tempore futura sit. At hujusmodi necessitas nihilo minus evincitur ex suppositione actus liberi cujuscunque quam ex suppositione decreti Divini: etenim posito quod existat actus liber, necesse est ut existat.]
And yet plainer ibid. sect. 18. pag. 332. c. 2. [At ea necessitas quam juxta nostram sententiam oriri putat Arminius ex Decreto Dei, revera non tam ex Decreto Dei fluit, (quod monuit Perkinsius, & vere,) quam ex suppositione decreti divini, in Argumentatione scilicet: quoties scilicet posito decreto Dei de re aliqua futura, legitime infertur necesse esse ut suo tempore futura sit. At hujusmodi necessitas nihilo minus evincitur ex suppositione actus liberi cujuscunque quam ex suppositione decreti Divini: etenim posito quod existat actus liber, necesse est ut existat.]