A26883:667
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who,…Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who,…
Richard Baxter's Catholic theology plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriors who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,Richard Baxter's Catholick theologie plain, pure, peaceable, for pacification of the dogmatical word-warriours who, 1. by contending about things unrevealed or not understood, 2. and by taking verbal differences for real,
London: printed by Robert White for Nevill Simmons, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
402. II. If it were granted, that Quod prius est Intentione, posterius est executione, nothing would follow to gratify either party in these Controversies. For all would be but this, that [God Intended Himself, and the Fulfilling or Complacency of his own Will, before he willed any thing else that ever cometh to pass.] And what's this to the business?
402. II. If it were granted, that Quod prius est Intentione, posterius est executione, nothing would follow to gratifie either party in these Controversies. For all would be but this, that [God Intended Himself, and the Fulfilling or Complacency of his own Will, before he willed any thing else that ever cometh to pass.] And what's this to the business?
403. But they say, It is his Glory that he first intended: I answered before, His Glory is, 1. Himself (and then it's the same which I asserted:) or 2. a Creature (and then it is not formally his End.) 2. His Glory as it is his Complete Image on the whole perfected World, is his End indeed Materially: But that is but to be the Complete Means: The perfected means may improperly be called his End: But forma denominat.
403. But they say, It is his Glory that he first intended: I answered before, His Glory is, 1. Himself (and then it's the same which I asserted:) or 2. a Creature (and then it is not formally his End.) 2. His Glory as it is his Compleat Image on the whole perfected World, is his End indeed Materially: But that is but to be the Compleat Means: The perfected means may improperly be called his End: But forma denominat.
404. When they say, that it is the Glory of his Mercy and Justice, ⟨p. 62⟩