PART IV.
The first Charge made good, viz. against Transubstantiation: In which Popery is fully proved to be the shame of Humane Nature; contrary to SENSE, REASON, SCRIPTURE and TRADITION, or the Judgement of the ancient and the present Church; devised by Satan to expose Christianity to the Scorn of Infidels. p. 75.
Chap. 1. The first Reason to prove that there is Bread after the Consecration, from the certainty of the Intellects Perception by the means of sense. ibid.
Twenty Reasons against the denying of common senses. p. 77.
Chap. 2. The Papists Answers to all this confuted. p. 88.
Chap. 3. The second Argument against Transubstantiation from the contradictions of it. p. 96.
Chap. 4. The third Argument from the certain falsehood of their multitudes of feigned Miracles in Transubstantiation. Thirty one Miracles in it enumerated; with Twenty aggravations of those Miracles. p. 99.
Chap. 5. The Minor proved, viz. That these Miracles are false or feigned. p. 110.
⟨image 11⟩Chap. 6. Arg. 4. Transubstantiation contrary to the express Word of God. p. 117.
Chap. 7. Arg. 5. All these Miracles are proofless: yea, the Scripture abundantly directeth us otherwise to expound, This is my Body. p. 123.
Chap. 8. Arg. 6. Transubstantiation nullifieth the Sacrament. p. 128.
Chap. 9. The Novelty of Transubstantiation, as contrary to the faith of the ancient Christians: And the singularity, contrary to the Judgement and Tradition of most of the Christian world. p. 132.
Chap. 10. The second part of the Controversy: That it is not Christs very flesh and blood into which the Bread and Wine is turned. p. 146.
Chap. 11. The Conclusion: The Scandal of our difference removed. Whether the falsehood of one Article prove the Papists foundation false? Whether it do so by the Protestants? Whether Papists have any more Infallibility than others? The necessity of discerning the Essentials of Christianity. The distinction of Explicit and Implicit faith considered. How come so many Princes, Nobles, Learned men, and whole Nations to be Papists? All Christians besides Papists, are of one Church, though of many opinions. How come so many among us at home of late inclinable to Popery? What hope of Concord with the Papists? How to help them off their Councils? Snares in the point of Transubstantiation. Of their denying the Cup to the Laity. p. 152.
PART IV.
The first Charge made good, viz. against Transubstantiation: In which Popery is fully proved to be the shame of Humane Nature; contrary to SENSE, REASON, SCRIPTƲRE and TRADITION, or the Judgement of the antient and the present Church; devised by Satan to expose Christianity to the Scorn of Infidels. p. 75.
Chap. 1. The first Reason to prove that there is Bread after the Consecration, from the certainty of the Intellects Perception by the means of sense. ibid.
Twenty Reasons against the denying of common senses. p. 77.
Chap. 2. The Papists Answers to all this confuted. p. 88.
Chap. 3. The second Argument against Transubstantiation from the contradictions of it. p. 96.
Chap. 4. The third Argument from the certain falshood of their multitudes of feigned Miracles in Transubstantiation. Thirty one Miracles in it enumerated; with Twenty aggravations of those Miracles. p. 99.
Chap. 5. The Minor proved, viz. That these Miracles are false or feigned. p. 110.
⟨image 11⟩Chap. 6. Arg. 4. Transubstantiation contrary to the express Word of God. p. 117.
Chap. 7. Arg. 5. All these Miracles are proofless: yea, the Scripture abundantly directeth us otherwise to expound, This is my Body. p. 123.
Chap. 8. Arg. 6. Transubstantiation nullifieth the Sacrament. p. 128.
Chap. 9. The Novelty of Transubstantiation, as contrary to the faith of the antient Christians: And the singularity, contrary to the Judgement and Tradition of most of the Christian world. p. 132.
Chap. 10. The second part of the Controversie: That it is not Christs very flesh and blood into which the Bread and Wine is turned. p. 146.
Chap. 11. The Conclusion: The Scandal of our difference removed. Whether the falshood of one Article prove the Papists foundation false? Whether it do so by the Protestants? Whether Papists have any more Infallibility than others? The necessity of discerning the Essentials of Christianity. The distinction of Explicite and Implicite faith considered. How come so many Princes, Nobles, Learned men, and whole Nations to be Papists? All Christians besides Papists, are of one Church, though of many opinions. How come so many among us at home of late inclinable to Popery? What hope of Concord with the Papists? How to help them off their Councils? Snares in the point of Transubstantiation. Of their denying the Cup to the Laity. p. 152.
