A26959:1012
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson, 1675
Text 1 › Chapter 3: Mr. D.'s Justification of his slander of the Waldenses, Confuted more largely.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 11. Pag. 120. He proveth Mr. Wills guilty of unfaithfulness, want of conscience, cheating, forgery; and after, pag. 122. of manifold Lying. Because, 1. He knoweth that Cluniacensis —hath given no such wicked and false testimony, &c. And how proveth he that? [For both Osiander and the Magdeb. from whom he had it, give an account of Fifteen particulars &c.] Answ. 1. Doth that prove that Cluniac. hath no more? 2. Do they say that those fifteen are all? 3. And doth that prove that Mr. Wills knew it, who never saith, that he ever saw Cluniacensis book? as it seems Mr. D. did not. 4. Doth Mr. D. himself know it, of a book never read? See how this accuser proveth Lies? For my part I have not at hand either Cluniack or Osiander, or the Magdeb. and will not be at the labour to get and search them for nothing.
§. 11. Pag. 120. He proveth Mr. Wills guilty of unfaithfulness, want of conscience, cheating, forgery; and after, pag. 122. of manifold Lying. Because, 1. He knoweth that Cluniacensis —hath given no such wicked and false testimony, &c. And how proveth he that? [For both Osiander and the Magdeb. from whom he had it, give an account of Fifteen particulars &c.] Answ. 1. Doth that prove that Cluniac. hath no more? 2. Do they say that those fifteen are all? 3. And doth that prove that Mr. Wills knew it, who never saith, that he ever saw Cluniacensis book? as it seems Mr. D. did not. 4. Doth Mr. D. himself know it, of a book never read? See how this accuser proveth Lyes? For my part I have not at hand either Cluniack or Osiander, or the Magdeb. and will not be at the labour to get and search them for nothing.
§. 12. Pag. 121. he saith, [He knows that these particulars he mentions, were not charged on Peter Bruis but on the Albigeo's in the following Century by other hands than Bernard ⟨p. 389⟩and Cluniacensis who were dead long before.
§. 12. Pag. 121. he saith, [He knowes that these particulars he mentions, were not charged on Peter Bruis but on the Albigeo's in the following Century by other hands than Bernard