A26959:999
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson, 1675
Text 1 › Chapter 3: Mr. D.'s Justification of his slander of the Waldenses, Confuted more largely.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 4. But his second Demonstration is from the witness born against it by some of their most eminent leading men, viz. Berengarius, Peter Bruis, Henricus Arnoldus —
Answ. Berengarius is not used to be reckoned as one of the Waldenses, but if you will so call him, I have confuted the slander of him before.
His proof against Bruis is Peter Cluniacensis, of whom I have said enough to Mr. Tombs which I will not recite.
His proof against Bruis is Peter Cluniacensis, of whom I have said enough to Mr. Tombes which I will not recite.
§. 5. It is true that some Papists do rail at the Waldenses with abominable calumnies, as guilty of the most odious heresies, [denying the resurrection, and the salvation of Infants, asserting the common use of women, and abundance such:] Insomuch that it is become a hard question whether really there were any such people, or whether all were slanders: and among other things they charge them with denying Infant-baptism. And the Authors go so much on fame, and show so much falsehood, that many think that all are fictions. But Bishop Usher (de succes. Eccl.) and some others bring many testimonies to prove that