A26959:473
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Answ. 1. What is said before to the other Texts answereth all these. The Actions of adult Disciples only were in mention. 2. Infants are called Disciples, Acts 15. as I have elsewhere proved, on whose neck the yoke of Circumcision was laid; And in Matth. 28.19. when Nations are to be discipled. 3. Mr. T. himself confesseth that Christ was habitually and by designation a ⟨p. 168⟩Prophet in Infancy, and that so may Infants be Disciples.
Answ. 1. What is said before to the other Texts answereth all these. The Actions of adult Disciples only were in mention. 2. Infants are called Disciples, Acts 15. as I have elsewhere proved, on whose neck the yoak of Circumcision was laid; And in Matth. 28.19. when Nations are to be discipled. 3. Mr. T. himself confesseth that Christ was habitually and by designation a ⟨p. 168⟩Prophet in Infancy, and that so may Infants be Disciples.
Mr. T. 6. If in the distribution of the members of the Church then, Infants are not comprehended, then Infants were not visible Church-members — But, &c.
Answ. 1. Here he instanceth in 1. The sex, Men and Women, 2. Jews and Gentiles, 3. Circumcision and uncircumcision, mentioned, but not Infants. But if Infants be of neither sex, male nor female, nor of Jews or Gentiles, nor circumcision nor uncircumcision, I plead not for them.