A26959:950
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And to the next question, Whether Infants unbaptized when Baptism could not be had, be all damned? he answereth (Et per haec respondeo ad &c.) that is [And by this I answer your third objection, granting, that God if he will, may damn such an Infant, and do him no wrong, and if he will he can save him: And I dare not define either part: nor am I careful about reputation, or getting evidence in the case; but as a dumb man am silent, humbly confessing my ignorance, using conditional words*; because it is not yet clear to me, ⟨p. 361⟩whether such an Infant shall be saved or damned: But I know that whatever God doth in it will be just and a work of mercy, to be praised of all the faithful: And let not them like presumptuous fools, pour out themselves, that of their own authority, without knowledge, define any thing in that matter.]—Qui autem dicit, &c. But he that saith that in this case put, an Infant shall be saved, as it is pious to believe, he doth superfluously uncertain himself*, more than will profit him. But there are some things in Parents power though lapsed into a thing Past, for which it is necessary by Gods just judgement, that so it should come to pass: Therefore he that defineth, that neither Parents nor people so sinned, that it should so come to pass, doth speak as a Pie on the head of his own knowledge. But we believe it as a point of faith, that nothing befalls a man after the first grace, unless some part of mankind either merit or demerit, that this shall come to pass.]
And to the next qu•stion, Whether Infants unbaptized when Baptism could not be had, be all damned? he answereth (Et per haec respondeo ad &c.) that is [And by this I answer your third objection, granting, that God if he will, may damn such an Infant, and do him no wrong, and if he will he can save him: And I dare not define either part: nor am I careful about reputation, or getting evidence in the case; but as a dumb man am silent, humbly confesing my ignorance, using conditional words*; because it is not yet clear to me, ⟨p. 361⟩