A26959:963
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second…
More proofs of infants church-membership and consequently their right to baptism, or, A second defence of our infant rights and mercies in three parts ... / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for N. Simmons and J. Robinson, 1675
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Answ. Still false: 1 I have before transcribed the words out of the Printed book which are far otherwise. 2. It is not desinentes but qui quicquam definiunt. 3. It is not of all children dying without Baptism, but of those that could not have it, being prevented by death, when it was desired. 4. He saith this of those that determine that they are saved also. 5. And instead of c. 2. this is lib. 4. c. 12.
6. He saith, [That all truth is contained in the holy Scripture, and that which is not originally there, is to be accounted profane; And that we are to admit of no science or conclusion that is not proved by Scripture testimony, and that whoever holds the contrary opinion cannot be a Christian but flatly the Devils Champion] with more such cited partly out of Cochleus by Fuller, (false again) and partly de Verit. Script.] a book of Wickliffs which I have not, and I conjecture he never saw: For 1. I told you before the very words of Wycliffe that condemn only such abuses of outward signs, as show him to be of a contrary opinion. 2. Will any sober man believe that he damned all as no Christians, but Champions of the Devil, that thought that some Conclusions Physical, Mathematical, Metaphysical, Medicinal, Logical, &c. may be true that are not proved by Scripture testimony? and so that almost all Christians in the world are no Christians?
6. He saith, [That all truth is contained in the holy Scripture, and that which is not originally there, is to be accounted prophane; And that we are to admit of no science or conclusion that is not proved by Scripture testimony, and that whoever holds the contrary opinion cannot be a Christian but flatly the Devils Champion] with more such cited partly out of Cochleus by Fuller, (false again) and partly de Verit. Script.] a book of Wickliffs which I have not, and I conjecture he never saw: For 1. I told you before the very words of Wickliff that condemn only such abuses of outward signs, as shew him to be of a contrary opinion. 2. Will any sober man believe that he damned all as no Christians, but Champions of the Devil, that thought that some Conclusions Physical, Mathematical, Metaphysical, Medicinal, Logical, &c. may be true that are not proved by Scripture testimony? and so that almost all Christians in the world are no Christians?