A27029:355
The Scripture Gospel defended, and Christ, grace, and free justification vindicated against the libertines…
The Scripture Gospel defended, and Christ, grace, and free justification vindicated against the libertines ... in two books : the first, a breviate of fifty controversies about justification ... : the second upon the sudden reviving of antinomianism ... and the re-printing of Dr. Crisp's sermons with additions ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1690
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And here sometime they abuse the similitude of a Husband and Wife; whereas they are distinct persons, and one is not wise, just or guiltless, because the other is so; nor hath the Wife any propriety so much as in extrinsic goods, but by contract in the proportion granted by the Husband.
And here sometime they abuse the similitude of a Husband and Wife; whereas they are distinct persons, and one is not wise, just or guiltless, because the other is so; nor hath the Wife any propriety so much as in extrinsick goods, but by contract in the proportion granted by the Husband.
Some abuse the similitude of a Head and Members; whereas Natural Head and Members make one Natural Body; but so do not Christ and Believers: And a Political Head and Members are distinct persons, and one is not guiltless, righteous, wise or good, because the other is so. But of this more before, and elsewhere. Some here abuse the similitude of Christs being the second Adam, which you here (though not to this Error) insist upon. And then they feign us, 1. To have bee• otherwise in Adam than we were; 2. And his sin to be otherwise imputed to us than it was; And 3. The similitude to extend further than it doth.
Some abuse the similitude of a Head and Members; whereas Natural Head and Members make one Natural Body; but so do not Christ and Believers: And a Political Head and Members are distinct persons, and one is not guiltless, righteous, wise or good, because the other is so. But of this more before, and elsewhere. Some here abuse the similitude of Christs being the second Adam, which you here (though not to this Errour) insist upon. And then they feign us, 1. To have bee• otherwise in Adam than we were; 2. And his sin to be otherwise imputed to us than it was; And 3. The similitude to extend further than it doth.