A27064:223
Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the…
Universal redemption of mankind, by the Lord Jesus Christ stated and cleared by the late learned Mr. Richard Barter [sic] ; whereunto is added a short account of Special redemption, by the same author.
London: printed for John Salusbury, 1694
OF Universal Redemption. › Chapter 4: The First Proposition Asserted.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. Argument That Doctrine which consequentially denieth all Pardon of Sin, is not of God: But such is the Doctrine which I here oppose: Therefore, &c.
1. Argument That Doctrine which consequentially denyeth all Pardon of Sin, is not of God: But such is the Doctrine which I here oppose: Therefore, &c.
The Minor only requires proof.
Where the proper debt is discharged, or penalty undergone, in Law-Sense by the person himself who was obnoxious, there is no room for Pardon to such a Person: But according to the Doctrine which I oppose, the proper debt is discharged, or the penalty undergone, in Law-Sense by the Person himself who was obnoxious: Therefore according to that Doctrine, there is no place for Pardon to such.
Where the proper debt is discharged, or penalty undergone, in Law-Sence by the person himself who was obnoxious, there is no room for Pardon to such a Person: But according to the Doctrine which I oppose, the proper debt is discharged, or the penalty undergone, in Law-Sence by the Person himself who was obnoxious: Therefore according to that Doctrine, there is no place for Pardon to such.