A30247:2325
A treatise of original sin ... proving that it is
A treatise of original sin ... proving that it is, by pregnant texts of Scripture vindicated from false glosses / by Anthony Burgess.
London : s.n., 1658
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The reason why God cannot tempt to sin, is from the infinite perfection of holiness, which is in God: he is [Greek or Hebrew], He cannot be tempted by evil. It is true, men are said to tempt God many times, and so ex parte hominu, there is done what man could do, even to make God deviate from his own holy nature and Law: but the Apostle meaneth ex parte Dei, that God is of such absolute purity and transcendent holiness, that there cannot arise any motion in his nature to make him sin. For so we expound the Greek word in a passive sense, Estius himself granting, that the use of it in an active signification, can hardly be found, though Popish Interpreters plead for the active sense; but then there would be no distinction of this from the following words, Neither tempteth he any man. The original word is used only here in the New Testament. The strength then of the Argument lieth in this, God doth not tempt any man to sin, because he hath no inward temptation, or motion in his own nature to sin: for that is the reason why the Devil is so impetuous and forward in tempting us to sin, because his nature is first carried out to all evil & so there is no man that doth draw on another to sin, but because he in his own heart, is drawn aside with it before. The Apostle having thus justified God, and removed all cause of evil from him; In my Text he directeth us to the true internal and proper cause of all the sin that we do commit; and therein doth most excellently show the several steps and degrees of sin, whereby of an Embryo (as it were) at first, ⟨p. 457⟩it cometh to be a completed and perfected sin. This Text is much vexed by Bellarmine and Popish Authors to establish their distinction of a venial and mortal sin, though they cannot find any true aid from the Text.
The reason why God cannot tempt to sinne, is from the infinite perfection of holiness, which is in God: he is 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, He cannot be tempted by evil. It is true, men are said to tempt God many times, and so ex parte hominu, there is done what man could do, even to make God deviate from his own holy nature and Law: but the Apostle meaneth ex parte Dei, that God is of such absolute purity and transcendent holiness, that there cannot arise any motion in his nature to make him sinne. For so we expound the Greek word in a passive sense, Estius himself granting, that the use of it in an active signification, can hardly be found, though Popish Interpreters plead for the active sense; but then there would be no distinction of this from the following words, Neither tempteth he any man. The original word is used only here in the New Testament. The strength then of the Argument lieth in this, God doth not tempt any man to sin, because he hath no inward temptation, or motion in his own nature to sin: for that is the reason why the Devil is so impetuous and forward in tempting us to sin, because his nature is first carried out to all evil & so there is no man that doth draw on another to sin, but because he in his own heart, is drawn aside with it before. The Apostle having thus justified God, and removed all cause of evil from him; In my Text he directeth us to the true internal and proper cause of all the sinne that we do commit; and therein doth most excellently shew the several steps and degrees of sinne, whereby of an Embryo (as it were) at first,