A30249:775
Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the…Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the…
Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the errors of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians in XXX lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the errours of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians in XXX lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...
London: printed by James Young for Thomas Underhill, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
D. Decalogue resembled to the ten Predicaments by Martyr, and why. p. 3 The threatening of death to Adam if he did eat, &c. was fulfilled, in that he became then mortal, and in a state of death, not natural only, but spiritual and eternal also. p. 109. 110 Determination to one, takes not away natural liberty, nor willingness or delight in sin, which we are inevitably carried unto. p. 89. 90 Three general ways of proving the Deity of Christ. p. 133. 134 Four differences (not substantial but accidental) betwixt the Law and the Gospel. p. 251, &c. Fire Differences betwixt the Law and Gospel strictly taken. p. 257. 258. 259 &c. All Doctrine reduced to three heads: Credenda. Speranda. Facienda. p. 252. 253.
D. DEcalogue resembled to the ten Predicaments by Martyr, and why. p. 3 The threatning of death to Adam if he did eat, &c. was fulfilled, in that he became then mortall, and in a state of death, not naturall onely, but spirituall and eternall also. p. 109. 110 Determination to one, takes not away naturall liberty, nor willingnesse or delight in sin, which we are inevitably carried unto. p. 89. 90 Three generall waies of proving the Deity of Christ. p. 133. 134 Foure differences (not substantiall but accidentall) betwixt the Law and the Gospel. p. 251, &c. Fire Differences betwixt the Law and Gospel strictly taken. p. 257. 258. 259 &c. All Doctrine reduced to three heads: Credenda. Speranda. Facienda. p. 252. 253.
E. The Papists notion concerning Ecclesia, and Synagogue confuted. p. 252 If the Antinomians end were only to put men off from glorying in themselves, to deny the concurrence of works to Justification, it were more tolerable. p. 31 but then their books and end were not reconcilable. p. 32 Other ends which might make the Antinomians more excusable. ibid. How Christ is the end of the law for righteousness. p. 267 End taken two ways. ibid. Four ways Christ is the perfective end of the Law. p. 270. 271 Aquinas distinction of end. p. 267 Eudoxus said he was made to behold the sun. p. 77 Exhortations, to what purpose given to them who have no power of themselves to do them. p. 98 Errors in Doctrine damnable. p. 279
E. THe Papists notion concerning Ecclesia, and Synagoge confuted. p. 252 If the Antinomians end were only to put men off from glorying in themselves, to deny the concurrence of workes to Justification, it were more tolerable. p. 31 but then their books and end were not reconcileable. p. 32 Other ends which might make the Antinomians more excusable. ibid. How Christ is the end of the law for righteousnesse. p. 267 End taken two waies. ibid. Four waies Christ is the perfective end of the Law. p. 270. 271 Aquinas distinction of end. p. 267 Eudoxus said hee was made to behold the sun. p. 77 Exhortations, to what purpose given to them who have no power of themselves to doe them. p. 98 Errours in Doctrine damnable. p. 279