A41330:729
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
That the one body of Christ mentioned 1 Cor. 12.12. in which there ought to be no schism, v. 25. is meant the visible body of Christ, I think none will deny. So Rom. 12. & Ephes. 4.
1. It is such a body in which the Lord had set Apostles, Evangelists, 1 Cor. 12.18. Ephes. 4.11. such a body to which extraordinary gifts were given. But these were Apostles; not to one particular Church, but the Catholic Church visible.
1. It is such a body in which the Lord had set Apostles, Evangelists, 1 Cor. 12.18. Ephes. 4.11. such a body to which extraordinary gifts were given. But these were Apostles; not to one particular Church, but the Catholick Church visible.
2. One member is to suffer or rejoice with another, 1 Cor. 12.26. Ay, if it be a member and real member of our particular Church of Corinth; but for other Churches, and unless we are sure they are invisible members, let them go. Is this the meaning?