A41330:742
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5ly. It is an irrational thing that the Imposers of Conditions in things belonging to God, should be the sole Judges of the lawfulness of their Impositions.
First, Because there is but one word or Rule given, to which the Imposers and Imposed are strictly bound, and the Imposed may understand that Rule as well and better than the Imposers; else how the Protestant party will defend themselves against Rome (the Imposer) I know not; they suppose they understood it better than Rome, and so do you now think.
First, Because there is but one word or Rule given, to which the Imposers and Imposed are strictly bound, and the Imposed may understand that Rule as well and better than the Imposfers; else how the Protestant party will defend themselves against Rome (the Imposer) I know not; they suppose they understood it better than Rome, and so do you now think.
2ly. The Imposers have sin in them, and may sin; they are not Infallible; therefore their Impositions must be judged by others.