An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth…

Secondly, I demand of M. Walker, where I have thus branded him. True it is, that I do indeed directly and expressly charge him with ^gunequal dealing; and ^hwant of candour in his carriage toward M. Wotton. And this he returns never a word unto, nor will be able ever to wash off. With those other defaults here mentioned I do not my self charge him. I affirm only that such carriage as I there describe, ⁱhath been ever generally held a breach of piety and charity, and may well be deemed to argue no small defect of humanity, not to add of common honesty. And what I therein say, no ⟨p. 9⟩man, I suppose, will deny; not M. Walker himself. But whether M. Walker in his late dealing with M. Wotton have so carried himself, as to contract such guilt, or no, I pronounce not; ^*I say nothing, but leave it to be deemed and determined by others, upon that which afterward is related, under the hands, either of M Walker himself, or of those whom he himself chose, and by his own choice of them made competent Judges in his cause.

Secondly, I demand of M. Walker, where I have thus branded him. True it is, that I do indeed directly and expresly charge him with ^gunequall dealing; and ^hwant of candor in his carriage toward M. Wotton. And this he returnes never a word unto, nor will be able ever to wash off. With those other defaults here mentioned I doe not my selfe charge him. I affirm only that such carriage as I there describe, ⁱhath been ever generally held a breach of piety and charity, and may well be deemed to argue no small defect of humanity, not to adde of common honesty. And what I therein say, no ⟨p. 9⟩