A42456:36
An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth…
An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth Mr. Wotton, besides his former foul aspersions of heresy and blasphemy, with Arianism, Mr. Gataker with Socinianism, Dr. Gouge and Mr. Downham with a false attestation, Dr. Baylie and Mr. Stock with self-condemnation, all the eight ministers employed in the business between himself and Mr. Wotton with partiality and unjust judgement : upon occasion of a relation concerning that business / written by the said Thomas Gataker and by him now again avowed, wherein the said M. Walkers vindication is in many things showed to be an untrue relation.An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth Mr. Wotton, besides his former foul aspersions of heresie and blasphemy, with Arianism, Mr. Gataker with Socinianism, Dr. Gouge and Mr. Downham with a fase attestation, Dr. Baylie and Mr. Stock with self-condemnation, all the eight ministers employed in the busines between himself and Mr. Wotton with partiality and unjust judgement : upon occasion of a relation concerning that busines / written by the said Thomas Gataker and by him now again avowed, wherein the said M. Walkers vindication is in many things shewed to be an untrue relation.
London: printed by E.G. for F. Clifton, 1642
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
unless he will expunge Pareus, Piscator, and I know not how many more, generally so esteemed, on• of the List of learned and Orthodox Divines.
unlesse he will expunge Pareus, Piscator, and I know not how many more, generally so esteemed, on• of the List of learned and Orthodox Divines.
3. Yea but M. Wotton▪ […] M. Walker, is *proved a blasphemous […] by h• •onf•ssion. I answer in a word. How M. […] •th the denial of Christs righteousness imp• to be heretical and blasphemous; he plainly expresseth himself in his adefence; whence M. Walker produceth it. To which therefore, and M. Bradshaw's Preface to his English Treatise of justification, I refer the Reader: yet so, that of the one, and out of the other, somewhat hereafter also shall be said.
3. Yea but M. Wotton▪ 〈…〉 M. W•lker, is *proved a blasphemous 〈…〉 by h• •onf•ssion. I answer in a word. How M. th the deniall of Christs righteousnesse imp to be hereicall and blasphemous; he plainely exresseth himselfe in his