A42757:37

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…

Name: Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…
Author: George Gillespie

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversy concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiastical government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlessness of the chief objections made against the Presbyterial government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversie concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiasticall government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlesnesse of the chief objections made against the Presbyteriall government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...

George Gillespie 1613–1648London: printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker, 1646

[64], 590 p. · 229k words · Wing G744 · ESTC R177416

Title page: Princeton Theological Seminary Library copy, digitized by the Internet Archive (opens the Internet Archive in a new tab)

THE CONTENTS. › Book 1 › Chapter 3: That the Jews had an ecclesiastical Sanhedrin and Government distinct from the civill.THE CONTENTS. › Book 1 › Chapter 3: That the Iewes had an ecclesiasticall Sanhedrin and Government distinct from the civill.

Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.

[ Earlier:36–49 of 1,240

:36img 13

CHAP. III. That the Jews had an ecclesiastical Sanhedrin and Government distinct from the civill.

CHAP. III. That the Iewes had an ecclesiasticall Sanhedrin and Government distinct from the civill.

:37img 13

Divers Authors cited for the ecclesiastical Sanhedrin of the Jews. The first Institution thereof, Exo. 24. That the choosing & calling forth of these 70 Elders is not coincident with the choosing of the 70 Elders mentioned Num. 11. nor yet with the choosing of Judges Exod. 18. The institution of two coordinate Governments, cleared from Deut. 17. A distinct Ecclesiastical government settled by David, 1 Chro. 23. and 26. The same distinction of Civill and Church▪ government revived by Jehoshaphat, 2 Chro. 19. That Text vindicated. Two distinct Courts, one Ecclesiastical, another Civill, proved from Jerem. 26. Another argument for an Ecclesiastical Senate from

[ Earlier passages Later passages ]

The book

Title as printed

Author

George Gillespie 1613–1648

Place

London

Printer

E.G.

Bookseller

Richard Whitaker

Year

1646

Size

[64], 590 p.

Words

229,339

Catalogue

Wing G744 · ESTC R177416

Text

EEBO-TCP A42757

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…

CHAP. III. That the Jews had an ecclesiastical Sanhedrin and Government distinct from the civill.

CHAP. III. That the Iewes had an ecclesiasticall Sanhedrin and Government distinct from the civill.

CHAP. IV. That there was an Ecclesiastical Excommunication among the Jews: and what it was.

CHAP. IV. That there was an Ecclesiasticall Excommunication among the Iewes: and what it was.

CHAP. V. Of the cutting of from among the people off God frequently mentioned in the Law.

CHAP. VI. Of the casting out of the Synagogue.

CHAP. VII. Other Scriptural arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Jewish Church.

CHAP. VII. Other Scripturall arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Iewish Church.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Jewish Exomologesis, or public Declaration of Repentance by confession of sin.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Iewish Exomologesis, or publike Declaration of Repentance by confession of sinne.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Jewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of profane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the public Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Iewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of prophane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the publique Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

The author

Transcription key

Reformers309

Puritans1,782

Westminster Assembly24

Evangelicals36

CHAP. III. That the Jews had an ecclesiastical Sanhedrin and Government distinct from the civill.

CHAP. III. That the Iewes had an ecclesiasticall Sanhedrin and Government distinct from the civill.

CHAP. IV. That there was an Ecclesiastical Excommunication among the Jews: and what it was.

CHAP. IV. That there was an Ecclesiasticall Excommunication among the Iewes: and what it was.

CHAP. V. Of the cutting of from among the people off God frequently mentioned in the Law.

CHAP. VI. Of the casting out of the Synagogue.

CHAP. VII. Other Scriptural arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Jewish Church.

CHAP. VII. Other Scripturall arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Iewish Church.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Jewish Exomologesis, or public Declaration of Repentance by confession of sin.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Iewish Exomologesis, or publike Declaration of Repentance by confession of sinne.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Jewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of profane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the public Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Iewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of prophane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the publique Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

The author

Transcription key