A42757:392
Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…
Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversy concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiastical government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlessness of the chief objections made against the Presbyterial government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversie concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiasticall government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlesnesse of the chief objections made against the Presbyteriall government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...
London: printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker, 1646
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
9. Object. Mr. Prynne in his Diotrephes Catechised, Quest. 2. […] another objection from 2 Chr. 19. asking, whether it be not clearly meant, that as King Josiah himself (he should have said Jehoshaphat) did by his own regal authority, appoint Judges in the Land and in Jerusalem, in the preceding 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. & 10. Verses, to determine all controversies and punish all offences whatsoever, according to the Laws of God and that Kingdom, so he did by the self same regal authority appoint Amariah then chief Priest, over the Priests and Levites only. (implied in the word you, not over the people of the Land) in all matters of the Lord, that is, to Order, direct the Priests and Levites, under him in their several courses, and all matters whatsoever concerning the Worship, &c.
9. Object. Mr. Prynne in his Diotrephes Catechised, Quest. 2. 〈…〉 another objection from 2 Chr. 19. asking, whether it be not clearly meant, that as King Josiah himselfe (he should have said Iehoshaphat) did by his owne regall authority, appoint Iudges in the Land and in Jerusalem, in the preceeding 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. & 10. Verses, to d•termine all controversies and punish all offences whatsoever, acco•ding to the Lawes of God and that Kingdome, so hee did by the selfe same regall authority appoint Amariah then chiefe Priest, over the Priests and Levites onely. (implyed in the word you, not over the people of the Land) in all matters of the Lord, that is, to Order, direct the Priests and Levites, under him in their severall courses, and all matters whatsoever concerning the Worship, &c.