A42757:43

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…

Name: Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…
Author: George Gillespie

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversy concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiastical government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlessness of the chief objections made against the Presbyterial government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversie concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiasticall government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlesnesse of the chief objections made against the Presbyteriall government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...

George Gillespie 1613–1648London: printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker, 1646

[64], 590 p. · 229k words · Wing G744 · ESTC R177416

Title page: Princeton Theological Seminary Library copy, digitized by the Internet Archive (opens the Internet Archive in a new tab)

THE CONTENTS. › Book 1 › Chapter 6: Of the casting out of the Synagogue.

Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.

[ Earlier:42–55 of 1,240

:42img 14

CHAP. VI. Of the casting out of the Synagogue.

:43img 14

The casting out of the Synagogue is understood by Interpreters and others to be an excommunication ⟨image 14⟩from the Church assemblies, and not a civill punishment. Eight considerations to prove this. That he who was cast out of the Synagogue was shut out, not only from the company and fellowship of men, but from the place of public sacred assemblies. It cannot be proved, that he who was cast out of the Synagogue was free to enter into the Temple. The casting out of the Synagogue was abused by the Pharisees, as the casting out of the Church by Diotrephes.

THe casting out of the Synagogue is understood by Interpret•rs and others to be an excommunication ⟨image 14⟩from the Church assemblies, and not a civill punishment. Eight considerations to prove this. That he who was cast out of the Synagogue was shut out, not onely from the company and fellowship of men, but from the place of publique sacred assemblies. It cannot be proved, that he who was cast out of the Synagogue was free to enter into the Temple. The casting out of the Synagogue was abused by the Pharisees, as the casting out of the Church by Diotrephes.

:44img 14

[ Earlier passages Later passages ]

The book

Title as printed

Author

George Gillespie 1613–1648

Place

London

Printer

E.G.

Bookseller

Richard Whitaker

Year

1646

Size

[64], 590 p.

Words

229,339

Catalogue

Wing G744 · ESTC R177416

Text

EEBO-TCP A42757

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…

CHAP. VI. Of the casting out of the Synagogue.

CHAP. VII. Other Scriptural arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Jewish Church.

CHAP. VII. Other Scripturall arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Iewish Church.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Jewish Exomologesis, or public Declaration of Repentance by confession of sin.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Iewish Exomologesis, or publike Declaration of Repentance by confession of sinne.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Jewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of profane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the public Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Iewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of prophane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the publique Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. X. A debate with M. Prynne, concerning the exclusion of profane scandalous persons from the Passover.

CHAP. X. A debate with M. Prynne, concerning the exclusion of prophane scandalous persons from the Passeover.

CHAP. XI. A Confutation of the strongest arguments of Erastus, namely, those drawn from the Law of Moses.

CHAP. XII. Fourteen arguments to prove that scandalous and presumptuous offenders against the moral Law, (though circumcised, and not being legally unclean) were excluded from the Passover.

CHAP. XII. Fourteen arguments to prove that scandalous and presumptuous offenders against the morall Law, (though circumcised, and not being legally uncleane) were excluded from the Passeover.

The author

Transcription key

Reformers309

Puritans1,782

Westminster Assembly24

Evangelicals36

CHAP. VI. Of the casting out of the Synagogue.

CHAP. VII. Other Scriptural arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Jewish Church.

CHAP. VII. Other Scripturall arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Iewish Church.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Jewish Exomologesis, or public Declaration of Repentance by confession of sin.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Iewish Exomologesis, or publike Declaration of Repentance by confession of sinne.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Jewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of profane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the public Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Iewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of prophane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the publique Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. X. A debate with M. Prynne, concerning the exclusion of profane scandalous persons from the Passover.

CHAP. X. A debate with M. Prynne, concerning the exclusion of prophane scandalous persons from the Passeover.

CHAP. XI. A Confutation of the strongest arguments of Erastus, namely, those drawn from the Law of Moses.

CHAP. XII. Fourteen arguments to prove that scandalous and presumptuous offenders against the moral Law, (though circumcised, and not being legally unclean) were excluded from the Passover.

CHAP. XII. Fourteen arguments to prove that scandalous and presumptuous offenders against the morall Law, (though circumcised, and not being legally uncleane) were excluded from the Passeover.

The author

Transcription key