A42757:45

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…

Name: Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…
Author: George Gillespie

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversy concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiastical government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlessness of the chief objections made against the Presbyterial government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversie concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiasticall government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlesnesse of the chief objections made against the Presbyteriall government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...

George Gillespie 1613–1648London: printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker, 1646

[64], 590 p. · 229k words · Wing G744 · ESTC R177416

Title page: Princeton Theological Seminary Library copy, digitized by the Internet Archive (opens the Internet Archive in a new tab)

THE CONTENTS. › Book 1 › Chapter 7: Other Scriptural arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Jewish Church.THE CONTENTS. › Book 1 › Chapter 7: Other Scripturall arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Iewish Church.

Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.

[ Earlier:44–57 of 1,240

:44img 14

CHAP. VII. Other Scriptural arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Jewish Church.

CHAP. VII. Other Scripturall arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Iewish Church.

:45img 14

That the separation from the Congregation, Ezra 10. 8. was Excommunication. Josephus explained in this particular. Of the devoting of a mans substance as holy to the Lord▪ which was joined with the Excommunication. What meant by the cursing Neh. 13. 25. That the [Greek or Hebrew] or separating mentioned Luke 6. 22. was Excommunication, or a segregation not from civil fellowship only, but from sacred or Church communion. The Ecclesiastical use of that word touched.

THat the separation from the Congregation, Ezra 10. 8. was Excommunication. Iosephus explained in this particular. Of the devoting of a mans substance as holy to the Lord▪ which was joyned with the Excommunication. What meant by the cursing Neh. 13. 25. That the 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 or separating mentioned

[ Earlier passages Later passages ]

The book

Title as printed

Author

George Gillespie 1613–1648

Place

London

Printer

E.G.

Bookseller

Richard Whitaker

Year

1646

Size

[64], 590 p.

Words

229,339

Catalogue

Wing G744 · ESTC R177416

Text

EEBO-TCP A42757

Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…

CHAP. VII. Other Scriptural arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Jewish Church.

CHAP. VII. Other Scripturall arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Iewish Church.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Jewish Exomologesis, or public Declaration of Repentance by confession of sin.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Iewish Exomologesis, or publike Declaration of Repentance by confession of sinne.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Jewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of profane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the public Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Iewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of prophane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the publique Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. X. A debate with M. Prynne, concerning the exclusion of profane scandalous persons from the Passover.

CHAP. X. A debate with M. Prynne, concerning the exclusion of prophane scandalous persons from the Passeover.

CHAP. XI. A Confutation of the strongest arguments of Erastus, namely, those drawn from the Law of Moses.

CHAP. XII. Fourteen arguments to prove that scandalous and presumptuous offenders against the moral Law, (though circumcised, and not being legally unclean) were excluded from the Passover.

CHAP. XII. Fourteen arguments to prove that scandalous and presumptuous offenders against the morall Law, (though circumcised, and not being legally uncleane) were excluded from the Passeover.

CHAP. XIII. M. Prynnes argument from 1 Cor. 10. (which he takes to be unanswerable) discussed and confuted.

The author

Transcription key

Reformers309

Puritans1,782

Westminster Assembly24

Evangelicals36

CHAP. VII. Other Scriptural arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Jewish Church.

CHAP. VII. Other Scripturall arguments to prove an Excommunication in the Iewish Church.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Jewish Exomologesis, or public Declaration of Repentance by confession of sin.

CHAP. VIII. Of the Iewish Exomologesis, or publike Declaration of Repentance by confession of sinne.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Jewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of profane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the public Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. IX. Whether in the Iewish Church there was any suspension or exclusion of prophane, scandalous, notorious sinners, from partaking in the publique Ordinances, with the rest of the children of Israel in the Temple.

CHAP. X. A debate with M. Prynne, concerning the exclusion of profane scandalous persons from the Passover.

CHAP. X. A debate with M. Prynne, concerning the exclusion of prophane scandalous persons from the Passeover.

CHAP. XI. A Confutation of the strongest arguments of Erastus, namely, those drawn from the Law of Moses.

CHAP. XII. Fourteen arguments to prove that scandalous and presumptuous offenders against the moral Law, (though circumcised, and not being legally unclean) were excluded from the Passover.

CHAP. XII. Fourteen arguments to prove that scandalous and presumptuous offenders against the morall Law, (though circumcised, and not being legally uncleane) were excluded from the Passeover.

CHAP. XIII. M. Prynnes argument from 1 Cor. 10. (which he takes to be unanswerable) discussed and confuted.

The author

Transcription key