A42757:975
Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…
Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversy concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiastical government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlessness of the chief objections made against the Presbyterial government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversie concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiasticall government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlesnesse of the chief objections made against the Presbyteriall government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...
London: printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker, 1646
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Secondly, [Greek or Hebrew] may very well be translated, when supper was begun, or when they were at Supper, as I have before showed by like instances in the New Testament, Matth. 26. 6. 20. Things permanent as a house, or the like are said to be factae, when they are ended and complete. But things which are successive are said to be factae, when they are begun, as dies factus, not when the day is ended, but when it is begun. So here, there can be no more proved from the words, but that supper was begun, or they were at supper. This sense is given by Osiander, Erasmus, •ossanus harm. evang. part 3. cap. 1. beside the Centuri•ts, Salmeron, and Lud. de Dieu before cited.
Secondly, 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 may very well be translated, when supper was begun, or when they were at Supper, as I have before shewed by like instances in the New Testament, Matth. 26. 6. 20. Things permanent as a house, or the like are said to be factae, when they are ended and compleate. But things which are successive are said to be factae, when they are begun, as dies factus, not when the day is ended, but when it is begun. So here, there can be no more proved from the words, but that supper was begun, or they were at supper. This sence is given by Osiander, Erasmus, •ossanus harm. evang. part 3. cap. 1. beside the Centuri•ts, Salmeron, and Lud. de Dieu before cited.
The other argument may be this. Matthew, Mark and Luke, after they have told of the making ready of the Passover, add that Christ sate […] with the Twelve.
The other argument may be this. Matthew, Marke and Luke, after they have told of the making ready of the Passeover, adde that Christ sate with the Twelve.