A47576:1109
The Jewish Sabbath abrogated, or, The Saturday Sabbatarians confuted in two parts
The Jewish Sabbath abrogated, or, The Saturday Sabbatarians confuted in two parts : first, proving the abrogation of the old seventh-day Sabbath : secondly, that the Lord's-Day is of divine appointment : containing several sermons newly preached upon a special occasion, wherein are many new arguments not found in former authors / by Benjamin Keach.The Jewish Sabbath abrogated, or, The Saturday Sabbatarians confuted in two parts : first, proving the abrogation of the old seventh-day Sabbath : secondly, that the Lord's-Day is of divine appointment : containing several sermons newly preach'd upon a special occasion, wherein are many new arguments not found in former authors / by Benjamin Keach.
London: printed by John Marshall, 1700
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Object. That [Greek or Hebrew] is Greek for one, and therefore [Greek or Hebrew] may as well be rendered one day of the week as the first day of the week. Thus Mr. Bamfield on Acts 20. 7.
Object. That 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 is Greek for one, and therefore 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 may as well be rendered one day of the week as the first day of the week. Thus Mr. Bamfield on Acts 20. 7.
Answ. Take Dr. Wallis's Answer,1 viz. Surely this Author cannot think that [Greek or Hebrew] doth any where signify other than the first Day of the week. Moreover, all who well understood the Greek-Tongue, agree that the word is here the same as in Mat. 28. 1. Mark 16. 2. Luk. 24. 1. 2'Tis clear, saith one, to be the first Day of the week, since the same Phrase used by the Evangelists is made use of here by the Apostle, who no question follows the Evangelists.
Answ. Take Dr. Wallis's Answer,1 viz. Surely this Author cannot think that 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 doth any where signify other than the first Day of the week. Moreover, all who well understood the Greek-Tongue, agree that the word is here the same as in