A47585:281
Laying on of hands upon baptized believers, as such, proved an ordinance of Christ…
Laying on of hands upon baptized believers, as such, proved an ordinance of Christ in answer to Mr. Danvers's former book entitled, A treatise of laying on of hands : with a brief answer to a late book called, A treatise concerning laying on of hands, written by a nameless author / by B.K. ...Laying on of hands upon baptized believers, as such, proved an ordinance of Christ in answer to Mr. Danvers's former book intituled, A treatise of laying on of hands : with a brief answer to a late book called, A treatise concerning laying on of hands, written by a nameless author / by B.K. ...
London : Printed, are to be sold by Benj. Harris ..., 1698
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Laying on of Hands UPON BAPTIZED BELIEVERS, As such, Proved both fr… › Chapter 7
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. Since their Silence only is pretended, it carries no great force with it; must we of necessity produce all the Ancients expressly witnessing thereto, or else is all nothing that is brought from Antiquity in the Case? We have mentioned several ⟨p. 94⟩ancient Witnesses, and some of the 2d and 3d Centuries, which are neither spurious, supposititious, suborned Witnesses, nor Knights of the Post, tho Mr. D. is pleased so to call them.
2. Since their Silence only is pretended, it carries no great force with it; must we of necessity produce all the Antients expresly witnessing thereto, or else is all nothing that is brought from Antiquity in the Case? We have mentioned several ⟨p. 94⟩antient Witnesses, and some of the 2d and 3d Centuries, which are neither spurious, supposititious, suborn'd Witnesses, nor Knights of the Post, tho Mr. D. is pleased so to call them.
And now to conclude, we must say again, against what is mentioned, p. 54. that there is a clearer Precept for Imposition of hands on baptized Believers as such, than can be urged for that on Church-Officers, or the observation of the first Day of the Week, &c.
And now to conclude, we must say again, against what is mention'd, p. 54. that there is a clearer Precept for Imposition of hands on baptized Believers as such, than can be urged for that on Church-Officers, or the observation of the first Day of the Week, &c.
I have ground to conclude Mr. D. thinks it his duty to keep holy the first Day of the Week, as the Christian Sabbath.