A64002:188
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
TWICE Consideration.
TWISSE Consideration.
This Motive, as this Author calleth it, hath the first place in the 16th reason of Arminius; whereby he laboureth to disprove their opinion, who conceive the object of Predestination to be the Mass of mankind not created; as appears, in the declaration of his opinion made before the States of Holland, &c. and it is the first particular of six, mentioned in that sixteenth reason of his. And why should he divide it from the rest, and not clap them together, into this rank of motives, to prepare him to the renouncing of that Tenet, which here he impugneth, and add Arminius his other nineteen reasons hereunto to the same purpose; if himself be privy to the cause thereof, I am not? But as it lieth I will consider it. Now it proceedeth upon supposition, that such a necessity of sinning is brought upon man by this decree, as stands in opposition unto liberty. Whereunto I answer.
THis Motive, as this Author calleth it, hath the first place in the 16th reason of Arminius; whereby he laboureth to disprove their opinion, who conceive the object of Predestination to be the Masse of mankind not created; as appears, in the declaration of his opinion made before the States of Holland, &c. and it is the first particular of six, mentioned in that sixteenth reason of his. And why should he divide it from the rest, and not clap them together, into this ranke of motives, to prepare him to the renouncing of that Tenent, which here he impugneth, and adde Arminius his other ninteen reasons hereunto to the same purpose; if himselfe be privy to the cause thereof, I am not? But as it lieth I will consider it. Now it proceedeth upon supposition, that such a necessity of sinning is brought upon man by this decree, as stands in opposition unto liberty. Whereunto I answere.