A64002:1942
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
An Answer to a Letter of D. H. concerning Gods Decrees definite or… › Part 2: II.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. First, nothing is first in intention but the end, and 'tis not possible that the subject or occasion should be the end whereunto God works upon the subject thus or thus:
1. First, nothing is first in intention but the end, and 'tis not possible that the subject or occasion should be the end whereunto God workes upon the subject thus or thus:
2. Secondly, that which is first in intention is last in execution. And therefore if the making of the subject, and permitting of the occasion whereupon God means to work, were first in intention, it should be last in execution, that is, God should first work upon the subject before he had made the subject, or permitted the occasion whereupon he works.
2. Secondly, that which is first in intention is last in execution. And therefore if the making of the subject, and permitting of the occasion whereupon God meanes to worke, were first in intention, it should be last in execution, that is, God should first worke upon the subject before he had made the subject, or permitted the occasion whereupon he workes.
But yet I confess if you have a reason for what you say, unless you may receive some satisfactory answer unto that reason of yours, it will be a very hard matter to satisfy you; Therefore I come to the consideration of your reason, which is this.
But yet I confesse if you have a reason for what you say, unlesse you may receive some satisfactory answer unto that reason of yours, it will be a very hard matter to satisfie you; Therefore I come to the consideration of your reason, which is this.