A64002:1954
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
An Answer to a Letter of D. H. concerning Gods Decrees definite or… › Part 2: II.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5. Of the fifth I have already spoken enough, wherein I have laboured partly to discover the error of your argumentation, and yet withal so as to give you satisfaction in your own way.
5. Of the fifth I have already spoken enough, wherein I have laboured partly to discover the errour of your argumentation, and yet withall so as to give you satisfaction in your own way.
6. The sixth contains only an inference upon the former, and the inference is not suitable; for your assumption in the former Theses did but contend, that God must consider it; here you infer, that he must presuppose it; But it followeth not: For to consider it, 'tis sufficient that it is conjunctum; But to presuppose it is to maintain that it is antecedaneum.
6. The sixth containes onely an inference upon the former, and the inference is not suitable; for your assumption in the former Theses did but contend, that God must consider it; here you inferre, that he must presuppose it; But it followeth not: For to consider it, 'tis sufficient that it is conjunctum; But to presuppose it is to maintain that it is antecedaneum.
Besides it is as much peccant against the order, between the end and the means, as the former, whereof I have spoken sufficiently.