A64002:1986
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
An Answer to a Letter of D. H. concerning Gods Decrees definite or… › Part 2: II.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Resp. 1. This is all one with conclusio quinta, and admits the same answer:
2. Why do you say by occasion of that sin, and not by reason of that sin? perhaps you will say, because that sin is not the cause of Judas his damnation (for I cannot devise any other reason) but this is not sound, for that sin is the meritorious cause of Judas his damnation: For though he be damned for actual sins, yet is he damned for original also? Again, many thousand infants are damned only for original sin.
2. Why doe you say by occasion of that sinne, and not by reason of that sinne? perhaps you will say, because that sinne is not the cause of Judas his damnation (for I cannot devise any other reason) but this is not sound, for that sinne is the meritorious cause of Judas his damnation: For though he be damned for actuall sinnes, yet is he damned for originall also? Againe, many thousand infants are damned onely for originall sinne.
3. May you not as well say, that Gods decree to permit Judas his personal sins, is before his decree to manifest his justice in Judas by occasion of those sins? and consider I pray how little agreeable that is to your Tenet.
3. May you not as well say, that Gods decree to permit Iudas his personall sinnes, is before his decree to manifest his justice in Iudas by occasion of those sinnes? and consider I pray how little agreeable that is to your Tenet.