A64002:1988
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
An Answer to a Letter of D. H. concerning Gods Decrees definite or… › Part 2: II.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. May you not as well say, that Gods decree to permit Judas his personal sins, is before his decree to manifest his justice in Judas by occasion of those sins? and consider I pray how little agreeable that is to your Tenet.
3. May you not as well say, that Gods decree to permit Iudas his personall sinnes, is before his decree to manifest his justice in Iudas by occasion of those sinnes? and consider I pray how little agreeable that is to your Tenet.
4. And if the decree of permitting Judas his personal sins, be before Gods decree of punishing him with damnation, why should not the decree of giving faith, and repentance, and good works, be before Gods decree of rewarding with salvation?
4. And if the decree of permitting Iudas his personall sinnes, be before Gods decree of punishing him with damnation, why should not the decree of giving faith, and repentance, and good workes, be before Gods decree of rewarding with salvation?
8. Conclusio octava: Gods decree to manifest his mercy in Peter, or to make Peter a vessel of mercy, (which is properly decretum electionis) is before his decree to call Peter, to give him faith, and repentance, &c. because that is a decree de fine, this de medio.
8. Conclusio octava: Gods decree to manifest his mercy in Peter, or to make Peter a vessell of mercy, (which is properly decretum electionis) is before his decree to call Peter, to give him faith, and repentance, &c. because that is a decree de fine, this de medio.