A64002:2066
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Resp. 1. The answer unto the former may in every particular be accommodated unto 1this.
- 1T.
2. These you speak of are not different, but one decree, and the same: As I prove thus; Gods decree to leave them in the state of original sin, is all one with Gods decree finally to deny them faith and repentance: And Gods decree finally to deny them faith and repentance is all one with Gods decree to leave them in their actual sin. Also Reprobation, as it signifieth Gods decree of leaving in the state of sin, was never conceived to be other, then the decree of denying them faith and repentance unto the end: which whether it be not a decree of leaving them in actual sins as well as original, let any man judge. For God by this decree of final dereliction, did not only decree that they should be left in their sins before they come to the use of reason, but in their sins committed after also, in their youth, in their middle age, in their old age: otherwise it could be no decree of final dereliction.
2. These you speak of are not different, but one decree, and the same: As I prove thus; Gods decree to leave them in the state of originall sin, is all one with Gods decree finally to deny them faith and repentance: And Gods decree finally to deny them faith and repentance is all one with Gods decree to leave them in their actuall sin. Also Reprobation, as it signifieth Gods decree of leaving in the state of sin, was never conceived to be other, then the decree of denying them faith and repentance unto the end: which whether it be not a decree of leaving them in actuall sins as well as originall, let any man judge. For God by this decree of finall d•r•liction, did not onely decree that they should be left in their sins before they come to the use of reason, but in their sins committed after also, in their youth, in their middle age, in their old age: otherwise it could be no decree of finall dereliction.