A64002:2079
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But though you see no great matter to object against it, yet others do, that hold it absolutely impossible to be otherwise; namely impossible, that any thing in the creature should be the cause of the will of God quoad actum volentis; or of predestination, quoad actum praedestinantie, Insomuch that Aquinas professeth, never any man was so mad, as to maintain that there could be any cause of the will of God. p. 1. q. 23. Art. 5. in Corp. Cum praedestinatio includat voluntatem, sic inquirenda est ratio praedestinationis, sicut inquiritur ratio divinae voluntatis: Dictum est autem suprà, quod non est assignare •iusam divine voluntatis ex parte actus volendi: sed potest assignari ratio ex parte volitorum, &c. Deus vult esse aliquid propter aliud. Nulius ergo fuit it a insanae mentis, qui diceret merita esse causam Divina praedestinationis ex parte actus praedestinantis, sed hoc sub questione vertitur; utrum ex parte effectus praedestinatio habeat aliquam causam: Et hoc est quaerere, utrum Deus praeordinaverit se daturum effectum praedestinationis alicui propter aliquam causam.
But though you see no great matter to object against it, yet others doe, that hold it absolutely impossible to be otherwise; namely impossible, that any thing in the creature should be the cause of the will of God quoad actum volentis; or of predestination, quoad actum praedestinantie, Insomuch that Aquinas professeth, never any man was so mad, as to maintaine that there could be any cause of the will of God. p. 1. q. 23. Art. 5. in Corp. Cum praedestinatio includat voluntatem, sic inquirenda est ratio praedestinationis, sicut inquiritur ratio divinae voluntatis: Dictum est autem suprà, quod non est assignare •iusam divine voluntatis ex parte actus volendi: sed potest assignari ratio ex parte volitorum, &c. Deus vult esse aliquid propter aliud. Nulius ergo fuit it a insanae mentis, qui diceret merita esse causam Divina praedestinationis ex parte actus praedestinantis, sed hoc sub questione vertitur; utrum ex parte effectus praedestinatio habeat aliquam causam: Et hoc est quaerere, utrum Deus praeordinaverit se daturum effectum praedestinationis alicui propter aliquam causam.