A64002:2123
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. First, as concerning natural actions, he hinteth a distinction, between a proper permission of them, and a permission of them improperly ⟨p. 204⟩so called; that is opposed unto a natural, real, or Physical restraint, this unto a moral restraint, which is by way of dissuasion.
1. First, as concerning naturall actions, he hinteth a distinction, between a proper permission of them, and a permission of them improperly ⟨p. 204⟩so called; that is opposed unto a naturall, reall, or Physicall restraint, this unto a morall restraint, which is by way of disswasion.
First then if we take permission properly, as it is opposed, unto a natural, real, and Physical restraint, and denoteth a suspension thereof, D. Twice is so far from affirming, that they come to pass, upon Gods single, sole, and bare permission, as that he maketh Gods positive effection (whether by way of predetermination, or concurrence, he leaves to be discussed in another place) requisite unto the existence of them, without which they never can exist; for God is the principal and immediate 1cause of all beings and entities, and therefore of all natural actions.
First then if we take permission properly, as it is opposed, unto a naturall, reall, and Physicall restraint, and denoteth a suspension thereof, D. Twisse is so farre from affirming, that they come to passe, upon Gods single, sole, and bare permission, as that he maketh Gods positive effection (whether by way of predetermination, or concurrence, he leaves to be discussed in another place) requisite unto the existence of them, without which they never can exist; for God is the principall and immediate 1