A64002:2319
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
JEANS.
IEANES.
For answer, I shall distinguish betwixt the Flicite acts of the will, which proceed from the will, as their only and immediate principle, and such acts of the will as are only imperate, that is, performed at the beck and command of the will, but proceeding immediately from other faculties v. g. the understanding, loco-motive faculty, the parts and members of the body, &c. as walking, speaking, writing, and the like. Now I confess there can be no such difference between the elicit acts of mens wills, which should make some to be more proper, and others less: But yet notwithstanding this I affirm, that the imperate acts of mens wills, such as their injunctions, and precepts, whether by tongue, pen, or otherwise (to give an instance pertinent to the business in hand) are not called properly acts of their wills; and this I shall not dictate, but confirm by these three following arguments.
FOr answer, I shall distinguish betwixt the Flicite acts of the will, which proceed from the will, as their only and immediate principle, and such acts of the will as are only imperate, that is, performed at the beck and command of the will, but proceeding immediately from other faculties v. g. the understanding, loco-motive faculty, the parts and members of the body, &c. as walking, speaking, writing, and the like. Now I confesse there can be no such difference between the elicite acts of mens wills, which should make some to be more proper, and others lesse: But yet notwithstanding this I affirme, that the imperate acts of mens wills, such as their injunctions, and precepts, whether by tongue, penne, or otherwise (to give an instance pertinent to the businesse in hand) are not called properly acts of their wills; and this I shall not dictate, but confirme by these three following arguments.