A64002:358
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. His first Conclusion is this, Reprobation whereby God decreed not to give unto some everlasting life, and to permit their sin, is not conditionate, but absolute: neither doth it presuppose in God, foresight of the deserts of reprobates, or of their perseverance in sin unto the last period of their life.
1. His first Conclusion is this, Reprobation whereby God decreed not to give unto some everlasting life, and to permit their sinne, is not conditionate, but absolute: neither doth it presuppose in God, foresight of the deserts of reprobates, or of their perseverance in sinne unto the last period of their life.
2. His next Conclusion is, In the Angels that fell, there is no cause of their reprobation on their part, as touching the whole effect thereof, but before any foresight of their future sin, God, pro sua Voluntate, of his mere will, did reprobate some of them, and suffered them to fall into sin.
2. His next Conclusion is, In the Angells that fell, there is no cause of their reprobation on their part, as touching the whole effect thereof, but before any foresight of their future sinne, God, pro sua Voluntate, of his meer will, did reprobate some of them, and suffered them to fall into sinne.
3. The third, Infants departing in Original sin alone, there is no cause on their part of ⟨p. 61⟩reprobation, if they be considered in comparison with others which are not reprobated, and the like is to be said proportionably of men of ripe years.