A64002:465
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
DISCOURSE. The Third Motive. The Infamy of it.
IT is an Opinion (as it is maintained by the Supralapsarians) odious to the Papists, and opens their foul mouths against our Church and Religion, and so abhorred (maintained either Way) by all rhe Lutherans, that for this very Tenet, they call us damned Calvinists, think us unworthy to be above ground, and in their Writings protest; that they will rather unite themselves to the Papists, then to us.
IT is an Opinion (as it is maintained by the Supralapsarians) odious to the Papists, and opens their foule mouthes against our Church and Religion, and so abhorred (maintained either Way) by all rhe Lutherans, that for this very Tenent, they call us damned Calvenists, think us unworthy to be above ground, and in their Writings protest; that they will rather unite themselves to the Papists, then to us.
Sir Edwin Sands speaks of men, whom he commends for singular learning and piety, (whose opinion he so sets down, as he declares it to be his own) that they think it were no blemish for the Reformed 1Doctors to revive their doctrine, and to abate the rigour of certain speculative opinions, (for so he is pleased to call them) especially touching the eternal decrees of God, wherein some of their chief authors have run into such an utter opposition to all the Romish doctrine, as to have exceedingly scandalized all other Churches withal, yea, and many of their own to rest very ill satisfied.