A64611:1257
The sum of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism,…The summe of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism,…
The sum of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism, and then afterwards more enlarged by a sound and judicious exposition, and application of the same : wherein also are debated and resolved the questions of whatsoever points of moment have been, or are controversed in divinity / first Englished by D. Henry Parry, and now again conferred with the best and last Latin edition of D. David Pareus, sometimes Professor of Divinity in Heidelberg ; whereunto is added a large and full alphabetical table of such matters as are therein contained ; together with all the Scriptures that are occasionally handled, by way either of controversy, exposition, or reconciliation, neither of which was done before, but now is performed for the readers delight and benefit ; to this work of Ursinus are now at last annexed the Theological miscellanies of D. David Pareus in which the orthodoxall tenets are briefly and solidly confirmed, and the contrary errors of the Papists, Ubiquitaries, Antitrinitaries, Eutychians, Socinians, and Arminians fully refuted ; and now translated into English out of the original Latin copy by A.R.The summe of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism, and then afterwards more enlarged by a sound and judicious exposition, and application of the same : wherein also are debated and resolved the questions of whatsoever points of moment have been, or are controversed in divinitie / first Englished by D. Henry Parry, and now again conferred with the best and last Latine edition of D. David Pareus, sometimes Professour of Divinity in Heidelberge ; whereunto is added a large and full alphabeticall table of such matters as are therein contained ; together with all the Scriptures that are occasionally handled, by way either of controversie, exposition, or reconciliation, neither of which was done before, but now is performed for the readers delight and benefit ; to this work of Ursinus are now at last annexed the Theologicall miscellanies of D. David Pareus in which the orthodoxall tenets are briefly and solidly confirmed, and the contrary errours of the Papists, Ubiquitaries, Antitrinitaries, Eutychians, Socinians, and Arminians fully refuted ; and now translated into English out of the originall Latine copie by A.R.
London: printed by James Young, 1645
Title page: Internet Archive scan of the Early English Books microfilm
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Whatsoever things agree unto Christ, God and man, according to both natures, the same also do agree after the same manner, and as touching all parts to both natures. For, it doth not follow, Because the God-head is Redemptresse, therefore also it suffered, and was dead.
Whatsoever things agree unto Christ, God and man, according to both natures, the same also doe agree after the same manner, and as touching all parts to both natures. For, it doth not follow, Because the God-head is Redemptresse, therefore also it suffered, and was dead.
Now, That those things which in the person and office of the Mediator are, and abide proper unto one nature, neither are made, nor are by reason of the union, common to both natures, may be showed at large: but now let these few suffice: §11. Such as is the union of the natures, such is the communicating of the properties. But the union of the natures was not made in the natures, or into one nature, but in the person, or in one person: Therefore the communicating of the properties was made in the person, not in the nature; that is, the union maketh the properties of both natures common, not to one nature, but to one person. For not one nature, but one person, hath truly, as two natures, so also double properties and operations, and those infinitely differing; created, and increate, finite, and infinite. Wherefore, as by union the manhood was not made the God-head or God; so neither is it immense, infinite, and omnipotent. But contrariwise, man is truly and really as God eternal, so omnipotent also, and every-where, and giver of the holy Ghost. The reason is, because not the manhood, but the man-Christ hath indeed in his substance the eternal and immense God-head. §22. That which is proper to one, cannot be common to moe; that is, cannot exist or be found together in other subjects also of divers natures. For, To be proper, and, To be common, are contradictory, and therefore in farthest repugnancy. §33. There cannot be made one omnipotency, and one omnipotent operation to be both natures, whereby as well the manhood, as the God-head, should be really omnipotent, and work divine things, but there must needs be also one essence of both, whereby the manhood also must be really God. For the omnipotency, which they will have one and the same to be communicated to the flesh, is the God-head it self.