A64687:539
Twenty sermons preached at Oxford before His Majesty, and elsewhere
Twenty sermons preached at Oxford before His Majesty, and elsewhere by the most Reverend James Usher ...
London: printed for Nathanael Ranew, 1678
Speedy Conversion The only Means to prevent IMMINENT DESTRUCTION. › Sermon
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Quest. But now, what parts hath justification in it? we are wont to say that there are two parts; one imputation of righteousness, the other forgiveness of sins.
Sol. I answer; for my own part I think Justification is one simple act of God, and that it is improperly distinguished as parts; but rather as terminus a quo is distinct from terminus ad quem. And this I shall show unto you both by reason and authority, that faith is but one act.
Sol. I answer; for my own part I think Justification is one simple act of God, and that it is improperly distinguished as parts; but rather as terminus a quo is distinct from terminus ad quem. And this I shall shew unto you both by reason and authority, that faith is but one act.
Let none say that I take away the imputation of the righteousness of Christ: No; the bringing in of light, and the expulsion of darkness is not two acts, but one; but there is terminus à quo, and terminus ad quem. We are accounted righteous, and that is, we have our sins forgiven. And the reason is this; if sin were a positive thing, and had a being in it self, then the forgiveness of sin must be a thing distinct from the imputation of righteousness. Scholars know the difference between adversa and privantia, white and black are both existent, but darkness and light are not, but only a privation one of another. Darkness is nothing of it self, but the absence of light; The bringing in of light is the suppression of it: You must understand sin hath no being, no entity; it is only an absence of righteousness, the want of that light which should be in the subject: Which want is either in our nature, and then it is called original; or in our person and actions, and then it is called actual transgression. Sin is an absence of that positive being, which is, as I said, either in our nature, or works. Then thus I will resolve you in another point, viz. If sin were a positive thing, all the world cannot avoid it, but God must be the Author of it; for there is nothing can have a being, but it must derive its being from the first being, God. Now, how can we avoid God's being the Author of sin? Why thus; It is nothing.