A77854:754
Vindiciæ legis
Vindiciæ legis: or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the errors of papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians. In XXIX. lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London. / By Anthony Burgess, preacher of Gods Word.Vindiciæ legis: or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the errours of papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians. In XXIX. lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London. / By Anthony Burgess, preacher of Gods Word.
London: printed by James Young for Thomas Underhill, 1646
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
C A Cordial for a broken heart. p. 21. 22 Contradictions of the Antinomians. p. 30 A Community of goods not taught by the law of Nature. p. 81 Christs Incarnation cannot be supposed but upon supposition of Adams fall. p. 132 It is an hard matter so to set up Christ and grace as not thereby to destroy the law. p. 202 The doctrine of Christ and grace in the highest manner doth establish not overthrow the law. ibid. God entered into Covenant with Adam, in giving him a law. p. 119. 120 What a Covenant implies. p. 121 ⟨image 144⟩Why the Covenant of grace is not still a covenant of works, seeing works are necessary. p. 46 A Covenant of Friendship. p. 121 A Covenant of Reconciliation. p. 121 No Covenant properly so called can be betwixt God and Man. p. 122 How God can covenant with man. p. 123 Five Reasons why God would deal with man in a covenant-way, rather then in an absolute way. p. 124. 125 A vast difference betwixt the covenant in innocency and in grace. p. 126 The moral law delivered as a covenant, proved. p. 220 It hath the real properties of a covenant. p. 221 In what sense the law may be a covenant of grace, explained. p. 222. 223 Arguments proving the law a covenant of grace. p. 224, 225, 226 Objections answered. p. 227 Doctor Crisp confuted. p. 13. 14 Cursing taken two ways: 1 Potentially, so a law is always condemning. 2. Actually, so a law is not ever condemning. p. 6
C A Cordiall for a broken heart. p. 21. 22 Contradictions of the Antinomians. p. 30 A Community of goods not taught by the law of Nature. p. 81 Christs Incarnation cannot be supposed but upon supposition of Adams fall. p. 132 It is an hard matter so to set up Christ and grace as not thereby to destroy the law. p. 202 The doctrine of Christ and grace in the highest manner doth establish not overthrow the law. ibid. God entred into Covenant with Adam, in giving him a law. p. 119. 120 What a Covenant implyes. p. 121 ⟨image 144⟩Why the Covenane of grace is not still a covenant of workes, seeing workes are necessary. p. 46 A Covenant of Friendship. p. 121 A Covenant of Reconciliation. p. 121 No Covenant properly so called can be betwixt God and Man. p. 122 How God can covenant with man. p. 123 Five Reasons why God would deal with man in a covenant-way, rather then in an absolute way. p. 124. 125 A vast difference betwixt the covenant in innocency and in grace. p. 126 The morall law delivered as a covenant, proved. p. 220 It hath the reall properties of a covenant. p. 221 In what sense the law may be a covenant of grace, explained. p. 222. 223 Arguments proving the law a covenant of grace. p. 224, 225, 226 Objections answered. p. 227 Doctor Crisp confuted. p. 13. 14 Cursing taken two waies: 1 Potentially, so a law is alwaies condemning. 2. Actually, so a law is not ever condemning. p. 6