A77854:767
Vindiciæ legis
Vindiciæ legis: or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the errors of papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians. In XXIX. lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London. / By Anthony Burgess, preacher of Gods Word.Vindiciæ legis: or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the errours of papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians. In XXIX. lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London. / By Anthony Burgess, preacher of Gods Word.
London: printed by James Young for Thomas Underhill, 1646
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
P Palemon converted from his drunkenness by Plato's Lecture, which he came to deride. p. 67 Papists make three false differences betwixt the Law and the Gospel. p. 233 Paul and James reconciled in the point of justification p. 42 The perpetuity of the obligation of the law of Nature. p. 63 A distinction of a three-fold piety confuted. p. 78 The Law of God by Moses is so perfect a rule, that Christ added no new precept to it. p. 171 Different phrases used concerning the Ceremonial law, which are never applied to the Moral law. p. 212 The opinion of the Pharisees concerning the Law. p. 170 Why, besides the Moral law, a Positive law was given to Adam in innocency. Two Reasons. p. 103. 104 The Positive law did lay an obligation on Adams posterity. p. 105 The seven Precepts of Noah: What the Talmudists speak concerning▪ them. p. 137 It's a general Rule that the pressing of moral duties by the Prophets in the Old Testament is but as an explanation of the Law. p. 172 ⟨image 146⟩The Primitive Christians held it unlawful to kill in defence. p. 185 Capital punishments lawful in the New Testament. p. 181. 182 To what purpose are exhortations to them who have no power to obey. p. 69 Popery in a great part Antinomianism. page 266
P PAlemon converted from his drunkenness by Plato's Lecture, which he came to deride. p. 67 Papists make three false differences betwixt the Law and the Gospel. p. 233 Paul and James reconciled in the point of justification p. 42 The perpetuity of the obligation of the law of Nature. p. 63 A distinction of a three-fold piety confuted. p. 78 The Law of God by Moses is so perfect a rule, that Christ added no new precept to it. p. 171 Different phrases used concerning the Ceremoniall law, which are never applied to the Morall law. p. 212 The opinion of the Pharisees concerning the Law. p. 170 Why, besides the Morall law, a Positive law was given to Adam in innocency. Two Reasons. p. 103. 104 The Positive law did lay an obligation on Adams posterity. p. 105 The seven Precepts of Noah: What the Thalmudists speake concerning▪ them. p. 137 It's a generall Rule that the pressing of morall duties by the Prophets in the Old Testament is but as an explanation of the Law. p. 172 ⟨image 146⟩The Primitive Christians held it unlawfull to kill in defence. p. 185 Capitall punishments lawfull in the New Testament. p. 181. 182 To what purpose are exhortations to them who have no power to obey. p. 69 Popery in a great part Antinomianisme. page 266