A80608:1019
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the LambThe bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the Lamb: being discussed and discharged of blood-guiltiness by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how far liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly fear God? And how far restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not only raze the foundation of godliness, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how far the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alleged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteem. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Bachelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.The bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe: being discussed and discharged of bloud-guiltinesse by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how farre liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly feare God? And how farre restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not onely raze the foundation of godlinesse, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how farre the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alledged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteeme. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Batchelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.
London: printed by Matthew Symmons for Hannah Allen, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. That Excommunication of an Heretic is no persecution: and therefore by proportion neither is the civill punishment of an Heretic persecution; And the Reason in my words following reacheth both: for to persecute is to punish an Innocent: But an Heretic is not an Innocent, but a culpable and damnable person.
1. That Excommunication of an Heretick is no persecution: and therefore by proportion neither is the civill punishment of an Heretick persecution; And the Reason in my words following reacheth both: for to persecute is to punish an Innocent: But an Heretick is not an Innocent, but a culpable and damnable person.
2. I answered by concession of Hilary's words in Hilary's meaning, it is true, what Hilary saith, neither did the Apostles, nor may we propagate Christian Religion by the Sword, &c.
2. I answered by concession of Hilaryes words in Hilaries meaning, it is true, what Hilary saith, neither did the Apostles, nor may wee propogate Christian Religion by the Sword, &c.
Discusser.