A80608:1032
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the LambThe bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe
The bloody tenet, washed, and made white in the blood of the Lamb: being discussed and discharged of blood-guiltiness by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how far liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly fear God? And how far restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not only raze the foundation of godliness, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how far the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alleged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteem. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Bachelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.The bloudy tenent, washed, and made white in the bloud of the Lambe: being discussed and discharged of bloud-guiltinesse by just defence. Wherein the great questions of this present time are handled, viz. how farre liberty of conscience ought to be given to those that truly feare God? And how farre restrained to turbulent and pestilent persons, that not onely raze the foundation of godlinesse, but disturb the civill peace where they live? Also how farre the magistrate may proceed in the duties of the first table? And that all magistrates ought to study the word and will of God, that they may frame their government according to it. Discussed. As they are alledged from divers Scriptures, out of the Old and New Testament. Wherein also the practise of princes is debated, together with the judgement of ancient and late writers of most precious esteeme. Whereunto is added a reply to Mr. Williams answer, to Mr. Cottons letter. / By John Cotton Batchelor in Divinity, and teacher of the church of Christ at Boston in New England.
London: printed by Matthew Symmons for Hannah Allen, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
If it be observed, my Agreement with Hilary, then let it be observed, that the Discusser in whetting the words of the Authors of the Letter against us, layeth a false charge upon us, as if we maintained such persecution for cause of Conscience, as is condemned by the Ancient Writers. Of whom Hilary is named for one, and for the first: and yet in the Discussion it is found that we agree with him.
In that Answer to the speeches of the Kings, when I acknowledged, that none was to be constrained to believe, or profess the true Religion, till he be convinced of the Truth of it.
In that Answer to the speeches of the Kings, when I acknowledged, that none was to be constrained to beleive, or professe the true Religion, till he be convinced of the Truth of it.
I did not mean, that after he was convinced, he might then be constrained with civill censures: for neither believing nor professing to believe, is to be constrained with civill censures.
I did not meane, that after he was convinced, he might then be constrained with civill censfures: for neither beleiving nor professing to beleive, is to be constrained with civill censures.