A86003:20
Male audis or An answer to Mr. Coleman his Malè dicis. Wherein the repugnancy…
Male audis or An answer to Mr. Coleman his Malè dicis. Wherein the repugnancy of his Erastian doctrine to the word of God, to the solemn League and Covenant, and to the ordinances of Parliament: also his contradictions, tergiversations, heterodoxies, calumnies, and perverting of testimonies, are made more apparent then formerly. Together with some animadversions upon Master Hussey his Plea for Christian magistracy: showing, that in divers of the afore mentioned particulars he hath miscarried as much, and in some particulars more then Mr Coleman. / By George Gillespie, minister at Edinburgh. Published by authority.Male audis or An answer to Mr. Coleman his Malè dicis. Wherein the repugnancy of his Erastian doctrine to the word of God, to the solemne League and Covenant, and to the ordinances of Parliament: also his contradictions, tergiversations, heterodoxies, calumnies, and perverting of testimonies, are made more apparent then formerly. Together with some animadversions upon Master Hussey his Plea for Christian magistracy: shewing, that in divers of the afore mentioned particulars he hath miscarried as much, and in some particulars more then Mr Coleman. / By George Gillespie, minister at Edinbrugh. Published by authority.
London: printed for Robert Bostocke, 1646
No title page in the transcription: set from the catalogue record.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. I having confuted his Argument grounded on Psal. 33. 15. Prov. 27. 19. He shifteth the vindication of it, and still tells me he grounded no Argument on those places, but spake by way of allusion, Male dicis p. 6. Now let the Reader judge. His words to the Parliament were these, Might I measure others by my self, and I know not why I may not, (God fashions mens hearts alike; and as in water, face answers face, so the heart of man to man:) I ingenuously profess I have a heart that knows better how to be governed, then govern; I fear an ambitious ensnarement, &c. This Argument there largely prosecuted, hath no other ground but the parenthesis using the words (though not quoting the places) of Scripture. And now forsooth▪ he hath served the Parliament well▪ when being put to make good the sole confirmation of his Argument, he tells it was but an allusion. But this is not all▪ I confuted the whole Argument, drawn from his own heart to the hearts of others, and gave several Answers: but neither before nor now, hath he offered to make good his Argument.
2. I having confuted his Argument grounded on Psal. 33. 15. Prov. 27. 19. He shifteth the vindication of it, and still tells me he grounded no Argument on those places, but spake by way of allusion, Male dicis p. 6. Now let the Reader judge. His words to the Parliament were these, Might I measure others by my self, and I know not why I may not, (God fashions mens hearts alike; and as in water, face answers face, so the heart of man to man:) I ingenuously professe I have a heart that knows better how to be governed, then govern; I fear an ambitious ensnarement, &c. This Argument there largely prosecuted, hath no other ground but the parenthesis using the words (though not quoting the places) of Scripture. And now forsooth▪ he hath served the Parliament well▪ when being put to make good the sole confirmation of his Argument, he tells it was but an allusion. But this is not all I confuted the whole Argument, drawn from his own heart to the hearts of others, and gave several Answers: but neither before nor now, hath he offered to make good his Argument.