A86003:82
Male audis or An answer to Mr. Coleman his Malè dicis. Wherein the repugnancy…
Male audis or An answer to Mr. Coleman his Malè dicis. Wherein the repugnancy of his Erastian doctrine to the word of God, to the solemn League and Covenant, and to the ordinances of Parliament: also his contradictions, tergiversations, heterodoxies, calumnies, and perverting of testimonies, are made more apparent then formerly. Together with some animadversions upon Master Hussey his Plea for Christian magistracy: showing, that in divers of the afore mentioned particulars he hath miscarried as much, and in some particulars more then Mr Coleman. / By George Gillespie, minister at Edinburgh. Published by authority.Male audis or An answer to Mr. Coleman his Malè dicis. Wherein the repugnancy of his Erastian doctrine to the word of God, to the solemne League and Covenant, and to the ordinances of Parliament: also his contradictions, tergiversations, heterodoxies, calumnies, and perverting of testimonies, are made more apparent then formerly. Together with some animadversions upon Master Hussey his Plea for Christian magistracy: shewing, that in divers of the afore mentioned particulars he hath miscarried as much, and in some particulars more then Mr Coleman. / By George Gillespie, minister at Edinbrugh. Published by authority.
London: printed for Robert Bostocke, 1646
No title page in the transcription: set from the catalogue record.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5 Master Coleman and Mr. Hussey hold that ruling Elders and a Church-Government distinct from the civill Government in the times of Persecution and under Pagan Magistrates, can be no warrant for the like where the State is Christian. This plea for Christian Magistracy was Bishop Whitgift's plea against the ruling Elders. Answ. to the Admon. pag. 114.
5 Master Coleman and Mr. Hussey hold that ruling Elders and a Church-Government distinct from the civill Government in the times of Persecution and under Pagan Magistrates, can be no warrant for the like where the State is Christian. This plea for Christian Magistracy was Bishop Whitgifts plea against the ruling Elders. Answ. to the Admon. pag. 114.
6 Master Hussey, pag. 22. saith, that granting the incestuous Corinthian to be Excommunicated, the decree was Pauls, and not the Corinthians, and that it no way appertained to ⟨p. 38⟩them under the notion of a Church. This is Saravia his answer to Beza, De tripl. Epist. genere, pag. 42, 43: yea the Papists answer to Protestant Writers, by which they would hold up the Authority and sole Jurisdiction of the Prelates (as the Apostles successors) to Excommunicate.
They do not more agree with the Prelatical Principles, then they differ from the Votes and Ordinances of Parliament, which is the other point that I have here undertaken to discover; and I shall do it by the particular instances following:
They doe not more agree with the Prelaticall Principles, then they differ from the Votes and Ordinances of Parliament, which is the other point that I have here undertaken to discover; and I shall doe it by the particular instances following: