A86004:14
Nihil respondes
Nihil respondes: or, A discovery of the extreme unsatisfactoriness of Master Colemans piece, published last week under the title of A brotherly examination re-examined. Wherein, his self-contradictions: his yielding of some things, and not answering to other things objected against him: his abusing of Scripture: his errors in divinity: his abusing of the Parliament, and endangering their authority: his abusing of the Assembly: his calumnies, and namely against the Church of Scotland, and against my self: the repugnancy of his doctrine to the solemn League and Covenant, are plainly demonstrated. / By George Gillespie minister at Edinburgh. Published by authority.Nihil respondes: or, A discovery of the extream unsatisfactorinesse of Master Colemans peece, published last weeke under the title of A brotherly examination re-examined. Wherein, his self-contradictions: his yeelding of some things, and not answering to other things objected against him: his abusing of Scripture: his errors in divinity: his abusing of the Parliament, and indangering their authority: his abusing of the Assembly: his calumnies, and namely against the Church of Scotland, and against my selfe: the repugnancy of his doctrin to the solemne League and Covenant, are plainly demonstrated. / By George Gillespie minister at Edenburgh. Published by authority.
London: printed for Robert Bostock, 1645
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The particulars in my brief Examination, which Mr. Coleman either granteth expressly, or else doth not reply unto.
The particulars in my brief Examination, which Mr. Coleman either granteth expresly, or else doth not reply unto.
MY Argument Page 32. proving, that as many things ought to be established Jure divino as can well be, because he cannot answer it, therefore he granteth it. Pag. 5.
He had in his Sermon called for plain and clear institutions, and let Scripture speak expressly. Now pag. 7. he yieldeth, that it is not only a Divine Truth (as I called it) but clear Scripture, which is drawn by necessary consequence from Scripture.
He had in his Sermon call'd for plaine and cleare institutions, and let Scripture speake expresly. Now pag. 7. he yeeldeth, that it is not onely a Divine Truth (as I call'd it) but cleare Scripture, which is drawne by necessary consequence from Scripture.
He hath not yet (though put in mind) produced the least exception against the known Arguments for Excommunication and Church Government, drawn from Mat. 18. and