A89732:621
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the…
A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousness active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue entitled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the general court.A discussion of that great point in divinity, the sufferings of Christ; and the question about his righteousnesse active, passive : and the imputation thereof. Being an answer to a dialogue intituled The meritorious price of redemption, justification, &c. / By John Norton teacher of the church at Ipswich in New-England. Who was appointed to draw up this answer by the generall court.
London: printed by A.M. for Geo. Calvert, 1653
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I spare to recite the variety of the opinions of the ⟨p. 128⟩Learned concerning the place of hell, with such reasons as are most probable, not looking at it as pertinent to the controversy. To search out the place of hell, it not being revealed in the word, is curiosity; to labour according to what is written that we may not come in that place of torment, is our duty.
I spare to recite the variety of the opinionss of the ⟨p. 128⟩Learned concerning the place of hell, with such reasons as are most probable, not looking at it as pertinent to the controversie. To search out the place of hell, it not being revealed in the word, is curiosity; to labour according to what is written that we may not come in that place of torment, is our duty.
If hell were in Aristotle's Element of fire (the very being of which sounder Philosophy denieth) yet if you hearkened either to the learned Philosophers or Mathematicians who distinguish the heaven of the blessed, and this inferior Universe into the visible and invisible world, and teach us, that there is a most vast (and unto the unlearned incredible) distance between the supposed Element of fire, and the first mover (what then is the distance between it and the heaven of heavens) you would not think that the blessed and damned could see and talk with one another.
If hell were in Aristotles Element of fire (the very being of which sounder Philosophy denieth) yet if you hearkened either to the learned Philosophers or Mathematicians who distinguish the heaven of the blessed, and this inferiour Universe into the visible and invisible world, and teach us, that there is a most vast (and unto the unlearned incredible) distance between the supposed Element of fire, and the first mover (what then is the distance beeween it and the heaven of heavens) you would not think that the blessed and damned could see and talk with one another.