A92138:1200
The divine right of church-government and excommunication
The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peaceable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justified, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examined; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peacable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justifi'd, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examin'd; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.
London: printed by John Field for Christopher Meredith, 1646
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Ans. Nathan had assurance from God that his sin was pardoned; 2. That the Sanhedrin did not cast David out is a fact, and proveth not they had no power; for 80. Priests cast Uzziah out of the house of God for a less fault, that carried in its face less scandal.
Ans. Nathan had assurance from God that his sin was pardoned; 2. That the Sanedrim did not cast David out is a fact, and proveth not they had no power; for 80. Priests cast Vzziah out of the house of God for a lesse fault, that carried in its face lesse scandall.
Erastus. The Prophets never accuse the Priests, that they admitted the unclean to the sacrifices and holy things of God.
Ans. The contrary is evident, Jer. 5. 31. Ezek. 22. 25, 26. and 44. 8, 9, 10. contrary to their Office, Deut. 17. 11, 12. Levit. 10. 10.
Ans. The contrary is evident, Ier. 5. 31. Ezek. 22. 25, 26. and 44. 8, 9, 10. contrary to their Office,